Bulverism

Lewis argues against Bulverism by exposing its weaknesses. In fact, by exposing this argumentation style’s weaknesses Lewis simultaneously strengthens his argumentation style. And, his style of argumentation is turning to Christ at every point, which becomes the great lesson to learn from God in the Dock: “Bulverism”. To begin, the largest weakness of Bulverism is that it assumes its opponent is wrong. For example, almost every American leans on this strategy in politics, social relationships, religious sects, and more. The problem in assuming the opponent is wrong is simply that they could be right. Lewis’ position is that a thorough investigation resulting in a definitive conclusion must be formed before any real reason is made.

Essentially, looking along with the opponent is Lewis’ solution to Bulverism. Further, he calls for ceasing the search to find out who is wrong and who is right, and beginning a search for the truth. Here, humility through internal scrutiny and the work of the Holy Spirit will reveal truth. Indeed, seeking this truth is a fundamental trait of a Christian’s character. Our hearts should constantly be asking the question, “If Christ were living my life, how would he live it?” This means, I don’t have to move to Israel and become Jewish to be like Christ, but rather I have to begin every situation with the intention of living it like Christ would. Then, my assumption becomes a Christ-like assumption, one of love, wisdom, righteousness, and understanding.